Arvind Kejriwal! You made history but don’t become one

Arvind Kejriwal (AK) has done the pheonix by rising from nowhere to virtually owning the Delhi assembly!

arvind kejriwal

It is not my intention to analyze how he managed to do it and what were the factors that led to this remarkable victory because that is already done ad nauseam. I am more concerned about going forward and this is where AK will do well to learn from history.

Circa 1982: NT Rama Rao started his Telugu Desam party in Andhra and within a year he won a landslide victory by securing 201 seats out of 270 against Indira Gandhi, then PM.

ntr

Circa 1984 Dec: Rajiv Gandhi swept the Lok Sabha polls by winning a massive mandate of 404 seats (a feat that his illustrious grand father or mother could not even come close). Incidentally, there were only 2 BJP members in that lok sabha viz AB Vajpayee and LK Advani

rajiv

1991:Jayalalitha’s ADMK with Congress won 225 out of 234 seats in Tamilnadu and the then incumbent party DMK managed to get only 2 seats.

jayalalitha

The common theme amongst these examples is that all of them wasted the huge mandate possibly because they weren’t ready for that! Or possibly the results got into their heads!! You may be already aware about what happened to them and more importantly how the nation/states lost out despite giving them such clear and massive mandates.

Now let us look at the other extreme.

At the same time as Jayalalitha, PV Narasimha Rao took over the mantle of PM leading the INC which won only 244 seats (less than the minimum 272 for a majority) but then transformed the nation.

pvn

So Mr Kejriwal, you have a choice of fulfilling the aspirations of the Delhi voters who have given a never-before drubbing to everybody else in your party’s favour or letting the verdict get into your head.  You have got a second chance but you may not get a third one.  More importantly, Delhi and perhaps the Nation will go back to the cynical mindset.

Wish you (and Delhi) all the best!! Jai Hind

Advertisements

5 Serious Questions to Banks on their new practice of charging for ATM Transactions

Yesterday at an ATM of Union Bank of India, I saw a poster (see below) that was revealing and self-explanatory in the context of charging for ATM usage beyond the ‘free’ transactions.  The poster had clearly differentiated between Financial and non- Financial transactions.

Displaying photo.JPG

Background:  For many years, Banks have been campaigning to get their customers away from the branches to reduce the cost of transactions.  They started with the ATM culture where a customer can withdraw cash only from the ATMs of that particular bank and then as adoption increased they made it possible for customers of any Visa card to withdraw from any bank that supported the network.  And just like the mobile revolution, customers started using ATMS and more or less stopped going to the counters to withdraw cash except in situations where the withdrawal amount was more than the limit for withdrawal by ATMs.

And now when ATMs have become a habit, they have chosen to limit the transactions and charge for anything more than the limit.  So what was created as a service to help customers enjoy convenience has now become a ‘Revenue Model’.

When I first came to know about this ‘free and then fee’ model, I thought it was fair on the grounds that if a customer can do 5 Free Transactions on the Banks’s own ATMs and 3 more in other ATMs in a month, he/she can actually transact 8 times using an ATM in a month.  It seemed inconceivable to me that anyone would require more than this until I started reading the small print.

It was not just withdrawals but anything that you do in an ATM.  See the above image once again and you will notice that Free Transactions would include Financial and Non-Financial and they have clearly listed out what would constitute a transaction. (I am happy that they have not included (as yet) “asking for a receipt for the transaction” as another Transaction)

I see that different banks offer different limits for the ‘Free’ but I am going to consider them as a single entity for the 5 questions (on the lines of daily 5 questions that BJP is posing to the AAP) that follow.

1. So do the banks want more people to come to the branches now and use the ATMs sparingly?  This defeats the original purpose of offering this service because the cost of say ‘cash withdrawal’ at the branch was significantly higher than at the ATM.

2.  Will there be a warning to the customers at the ATM or via sms when they exhaust the number of Free Transactions for the month and that they will be charged for further transactions during the month?  I suppose Banks don’t expect their customers to keep track of their transactions on the own Bank ATMs and the network ATMs.

3. If the bank’s intention is that customers should pay for the services they enjoy, will it also extend to the number of debit card transactions and going forward Internet Banking? There is a high push from Banks to encourage the customers to use the debit cards instead of cash and I suspect that they will charge for debit card usage once it takes off.  Likewise for the other services like sms banking, internet banking, app banking to just name a few.

4.  Will banks allow carry forward of unused transactions for a period of 6 months? As a customer, I can plan my usage on a larger time window than just a month.  If the Banks have the wherewithal to track the number of financial and non-financial transactions, surely they can offer this facility.

5.  Is this a ploy to create new products like a premium account where the number of transactions on ATMs (or any other channels) will be unlimited to attract more customers?

Bonus question:  Are the charges levied for the extra transactions inclusive of Service tax? I know that this is trivial but since there is no * in the poster above, I want a clarification.

I’m surprised and shocked that RBI has allowed Banks to get away with such customer-unfriendly practices.

Mr Raghuram Rajan, are you listening?

Continuing ‘Economist’ malice towards Modi

economist

In April 2014, the Economist wrote a cover story titled ‘Can anyone stop Narendra Modi?’.  It created a furore.

modi

The recent print edition of the same Economist dated 24th May 2014 carries another article titled ‘India’s Strong Man’ again featuring Narendra Modi (who else!!!).

Just like most of the TV shows and the print media in India who are unable to digest the clarity of the electoral verdict in favour of BJP and Modi, this recent article of the Economist also has played mischief.  In the guise of congratulating Modi, which it does reluctantly, the article spews venom and vitriol.

Let’s see some excerpts of this article now.

Although we did not endorse him, because we believe that he has not atoned sufficiently for the massacre of Muslims that took place in Gujarat while he was chief minister, we wish him every success: 

First of all, who is Economist to endorse an Indian politician, especially the one  who has carried people across the country? That audacity aside, look at the reason for not having endorsed him!  ‘He has not atoned sufficiently’! Now Economist has acquired the moral authority and the standing to decide who is atone and what level of atonement is sufficient!!  Further, look at the language “massacre of muslims’! That Hindus also lost their lives in the riots is immaterial!  It clearly shows that the Economist has outsourced, unwisely, the generation of false content to the Indian media!

Next look at this:

Mr Modi has a mandate for economic reform. Although his core supporters are religious nationalists, steeped in the glories of a Hindu past, it was the votes of the young, urban and educated that won him the election

Notice the slant?  And the lies?  Despite the fact that he has won 71 seats out of 80 in UP and 22 seats in Bihar, he is painted as though only the young, urban and the educated have supported him.  No doubt they did but they were not the only folks.  The poor, the rural and those so-called ‘uneducated’ too gave him the mandate.  And look at the branding of the core supporters as ‘religious nationalists’, that too steeped in the glories of a Hindu past! Typical of a British media that has played truant with our history and heritage! But then what else can we expect?

And that is not all!

But while he has already worshipped at the Ganges since his victory, promising to clean up the river sacred to Hindus, he has not brought himself to mention Muslims, who make up 15% of the population.

The author sounds like Sagarika Ghose of CNN IBN who asked Modi if he will visit a Dargah too after offering prayers at the Kasi Viswanathar temple!  All of them have conveniently forgotten the fact that Modi is a Hindu and is practising his faith! Just because he is a PM designate, does it mean that he gives up his religion or should pander to every faith!  This is the ugly version of the psuedo-Secularism rightly called as Sickularism.  Modi has not mentioned Christians or Sikhs either! When he mentions and he has done it countless times of ‘Everyone’, it obviously includes all faiths, religions and denominations.  If the Indian Media and the liberals behave as if they will accept Modi as Secular only if he wears a skull cap or visits a mosque or dargah, he has clearly told them that he does not want their certificate.  Certainly, he does not need the ‘endorsement’ from The Economist.

Some of the possible predictions of his tenure outlined by this article are fascinating.  Read this

Mr Modi’s strength will go to his head, and he will rule as an autocrat. Mr Modi has authoritarian tendencies.

I did not know that the author of this article has closely observed Modi for a long time, going by the declaration that Modi has authoritarian tendencies. Conclusions are already drawn and the verdict has been written even before the case comes before the court! Some journalism!

If this is the quality of a reputed international magazine, then we can imagine the state of affairs of the others!

Wow! Indian Main Stream Media (MSM) has truly gone global! 

No wonder we are in this mess!!

Yesterday, a good friend of ours came home and quickly our conversation veered to the elections.  

Image

He said he will vote for the DMK candidate of his constituency because that person has worked in a bank, is educated (CAIIB) and speaks English.

And in the same breath, he said that he had arranged for a meeting to help the BJP Candidate because they are from the same caste.

So much so for the parameters of the ‘so-called’ educated middle class to choose our representatives!! And he had the audacity to blame  those in the slums for the political situation!!

With these kind of electorate, I am not surprised about the depths to which our political system has fallen.

And Arvind Kejriwal is a common man!

Image

There is absolutely no doubt that Arvind Kejriwal (AK) has become a meteor in the Indian political scenario!  But is he a common man as eloquently described by many?  Let’s look at this description deeply.

  1. For those uninitiated, AK is an alumnus of Indian Institute of Technology at Kharagpur where he studied Mechanical Engineering.  As many would know, getting admission into the prestigious IIT’s is no mean task and is a feat done by a few thousand out of lakhs of applicants.  And AK is a common man!
  2. AK then joined Indian Revenue Service (IRS) and served in the Income Tax department in different roles. And AK is a common man!
  3. It now gets even more interesting.  AK was awarded the Ramon Magsaysay Award in 2006 for Emergent Leadership.  This Award is considered to be Asia’s Nobel Prize and has been instituted by Rockfeller Brothers.  Let’s leave out the conspiracy theories for a moment and let’s take a look at the awardees.  I see the names of Acharya Vinobha Bhave, Baba Amte, MS Subbulakshmi, Jaiprakash Narayan, Verghese Kurien, Dr Shantha of Cancer Institute amongst many others from different countries in Asia.  The reason for giving AK this award in 2006 is “his contribution to the enactment of the Right to Information Act and for his efforts to empower the poorest citizens of India”.  While the nation came to know of AK only during Anna Hazare’s movement in 2011, the award jury had identified him for his contribution as early as 2006!!  It would be interesting to know that the RTI Act was passed by the Parliament only in 2005!!  You can draw your own conclusions.  And AK is a common man!
  4. I do not know if someone has made the effort to calculate the amount of media time that AK has garnered in the last two years, ever since he has been one of the key figures in the Anna movement.  But nobody will doubt the fact that he has received extensive coverage, mostly positive, from the so-called mainstream media (MSM).  And AK is a common man!
  5. He made outrageous promises (including passing of the Jan Lokpal Bill on 29th December 2013 which incidentally is today) as part of his party’s manifesto and yet the media called him a politician with a difference.  And AK is a common man!
  6. I have lost count of the number of flip-flops that he and his team members have done in the last few months and yet no one is even making a mention of them.  And AK is a common man!
  7. AK called both Congress and BJP names and yet has taken the support of Congress to form the government.  And AK is a common man!
  8. Thousands of people travel on the Delhi Metro everyday and nobody pays them any attention.  But AK takes the metro to attend his swearing-in ceremony and the media is gaga about it.  And AK is a common man!

A request to all thinking Indians and to the media (if they are willing to listen).

Call AK as a shrewd politician, strategist, Chanakya, messiah or anything laudatory.  But please do not insult the common man by calling AK as one.

BJP needs confidence

The BJP has said that it would “renegotiate” the N-deal if it came to power.  Notice that it has not said ‘when‘.

This only shows how shaken the party is!

The Party urgently needs a doctor (perhaps Rama himself) to inject some self-confidence, immediately!!

A new twist to the tale!

Latest news !  Now the Karnataka CM has resigned and has promised to support the BJP but the Governor has recommended dissolution.

Everybody is to be blamed for this crisis.  Had the transfer of power been smooth as promised, there would have been any need for this chaos.  Now Kumaraswamy will cry foul that he has kept his promise but the Governor has acted in haste and the  BJP will conveniently forget the JD(S) antics and blame the Governor.  The Congress is still clueless about its strategy and hopes that it will get its act together soon.

In all this melee, the people are the ones who will suffer!

Just how many times will you learn?

Sometime back it was Mayawati and now it is Kumaraswamy!!

When will BJP learn that power once handed over will not be given back willingly, with a transparent agreement or otherwise?

If this national party still thinks that promises made will be kept, it only exposes its naivete!

Just because BJP made a mistake in believing Deva Gowda, the people of Karnataka will be facing fresh elections.  what a colossal waste of public money!

I wouldn’t be surprised if JD(S) contests the elections against the BJP on the so-called secular platform against the communal forces with the support of like-minded (!!@#) parties like the Leftists and Congress!

And nobody will ask these folks ‘why are you saying this now after enjoying power for 20 months with the support of communal forces?”.

People get the rulers they deserve! 

%d bloggers like this: